And a little more economically.. Load carrying capability. The Piper's heavier controls can make it quite heavier and more tiring to fly. It will keep up with an Arrow. Former Flying Educators Club Secretary and Treasurer Greg Utley shares his thoughts on both aircraft. The later versions produced in the 1990s and 2000s will cost a bit more with prices in the $75,000 to $100,000 range. The AA-5 series serves as an interesting alternative to the comparable Cessna and Piper models that make up the general aviation fleet. The club usesAvemcoand pays $6,000 a year, but Greg noted that Florida is an expensivestate in whichto insure an aircraft because of hurricanes and the fact the state is highly litigious. It's kinda underpowered for what we were doing with it, luckily no one was heavy and the distances weren't far. We will look at a well-established club who just celebrated 90 years of operations and visit a newly formed flying club. There is a reason why so many people fly the Cessna 172, and why it is said to be the most popular aircraft ever produced. The most popular of the Grumman series, the Tiger seats four, has a 180-hp engine, and burns 10 gph. For more than 30 years, the 10-member club owned a Citabria. get there? Find more About Us here! If your club is looking for an economical aircraft that can serve as a primary trainer and a solid cross-country platformwith good performance, the Grumman Tiger is a plane you may want to consider. But in the mid-90s, they decided to make a change[see this months Club Spotlight]. We are a collective group of airline instructors, and pilots dedicated to all things aviation. "Three or four of the 10 members would use it for aerobatics a lot. Greg said. We havent had any major problems with the Tiger.Aero on Demand said annuals without squawksrun about $1,200 depending on the going rate in your part of the country. many destinations within a 500-mile radius, including the Bahamas. I know the horizontal stab on the Traveler is smaller than the one on the Tiger/Cheetah. For more than 30 years, the 10-member club owned a Citabria. The Tiger was the outcome of the same redesign work on the AA-5 Traveler that resulted in the 150 hp (110 kW) Cheetah and it was originally little more than the same aircraft . , the members were used to something light and agile on the controls. Man erkennt eine AG-5B auch am T-frmigen Gashebel. The plane was always in a hangar probably a major factor.. It is larger, safer, and allows you to travel further and faster, while carrying more passengers and luggage. I'd take one over a 172 in a heartbeat. Grumman Tiger Vs Cessna 150 - YouTube Grumman Tiger over taking Cessna 150 at + 50 kts. Depends. Get the Tiger, you local flights will get boring after 100 hours and you'll want to stretch out to further destinations. Aircraft Spotlight: Comparing the Citabria and the Grumman Tiger, FAA publishes 'Aviation Weather Handbook'. Major overhauls were cheap. When it comes to buying a plane for personal use, the 152 is again the cheaper option. It holds 52 gallons and has a range of about 700 miles. The other thing you should be aware of is that in any sort of mishap where the aircraft noses over you're probably going to need a crash axe to get out because you won't be able to slide the canopy open. AA-5 prices can vary widely, but when we exclude the most extreme examples in a recent sampling of listings, the majority fall in the $30,000 to $60,000 range. That phrase sort of confuses me. Krish discussed having to change some avionics, propeller, engine cowling, and after 300 hours of flying him and his partners also had to overhaul the 180hp engine, which cost a whopping $28,000. If so did he sell it after 2 or 3 years and get into a twin? It burns 7 gph and the clubcharges $86 an hour. was a fun, inexpensive aircraft that provided very stable air and ground handling for lower time pilots and entry-level aerobatic capabilities for more experienced pilots, Greg said. Tiger owners report cruise speeds of 125 to 133 knots at 8.5 to 10 gallons per hour, while owners with 160 hp Cheetahs fly about 10 knots slower with a slightly lower fuel burn. They have an unnamed policy, meaning they dont have to list their members or their flight time, so anyone who joins the club is insured. Visibility is amazing. If you have an autopilot, its a wonderful cross-country bird, Greg said. Because there are so many of them, and they have been around a long time, there are a large number of mechanics and engineers who are familiar with what needs to be done to keep them in good working order, and obtaining parts for them should not be an issue either; they are easily available, even for the older Cessna 150s. Jason McDowell is a private pilot and Cessna 170 owner based in Madison, Wisconsin. If it is a new paint job people have got stripper in the joints remember this plane is glued together and stripper in the glue is bad, make sure this did not happen. assistance. Being based in Florida,the Flying Educators havemany destinations within a 500-mile radius, including the Bahamas,andmembers wanted an aircraft more suited to that mission. It also has a faster speed and a better range. The Grumman Pilots Association and Grumman Gang are additional resources, and enthusiastic support is available to the owner community in the form of online forums and video tutorials. Copyright 2023 Aviator Insider | A Topsail Media Company | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme. It's faster than a 172 and carries about the same load (typically about 800-850 lb useful), but is not as tolerant of grass or extremely short runways. The most affordable single-engine planes. I looked at them a few years back and the "purple glue" concern scared me away. . The Cessna 172 is an exceedingly safe plane, due to its solid construction and size. Not quite ready to buy yet, but for the right deal https://mailman.xmission.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/grumman-gang, Santa Rosita State Park, under the big 'W', E38F0B5E-2ED1-4B77-ADA8-8CE1FC154C26.jpeg, (You must log in or sign up to reply here. Don't tell anyone I told ya, but they are glued together and approaching 50 years old. Attention Cessna 172 Club Members! Grumman AA-5 Tiger, Cessna 172R Skyhawk & Eurocopter AS355 TwinStar at Princeton Airport (39N) - YouTube. Insurance should be similarly straightforward. The cost of ownership includes the original purchase price of the airplane, then you have you fixed cost like hangar, insurance etc. Its nimble in the air, seats four, and has a good cruising speed with minimal fuel burn. The reports of excellent visibility are not overstated: The wraparound windows, low beltline and low instrument panel provide a panoramic view. I only have time in the AA1X series, the baby brother of the tiger, the canopy design I think is one of the better ones in GA, no issues, the free castor nose wheel was great for ground handling, nice shock absorbing and strong fiberglass mains, good fuel tank system, etc. If you have four people, filling up to the tabs provides 38 gallons of fuel, and you should be fine for most cross-country flights. He enjoys researching obscure aviation history and serves as a judge for the National Intercollegiate Flying Association. The Citabria breed has an AD requiring a one-time inspection of the wooden spar where they have to check it for cracks. I had been learning about 172s. But the Cessna 150 is not unsafe by any means. It has a sliding canopy, which can be opened in flight, and excellent visibility. Perhaps because they are easy to fly, some pilots complain that both the Cessna 150 and the Cessna 172 are somewhat boring. So this might well decide things for you. Hi, Eddie, I'm at KHWO, too! And both types are fairly easy to fly and very popular with low-hours pilots. Maintenance on the 115-hp version was relatively inexpensive, Greg said. Its very responsive. ". Gulfstream ceased production of all piston-engined aircraft in 1979 and the highly successful Tiger design went out of production after 1323 aircraft had been delivered. The Cessna 172 has a larger engine, and so is correspondingly more powerful, and it has a higher cruise speed. The Tiger was the outcome of the same redesign work on the AA-5 Traveler that resulted in the 150 hp (110 kW) Cheetah and it was originally little more than the same aircraft with a Lycoming O-360-A4K 180 hp (130 kW) engine, resulting in a 139-knot (257 km/h) cruise speed. up. Gross weight was increased from the AA-5/AA-5A's 2,200 lb (1,000 kg) to 2,400 lb (1,100 kg) on the Tiger. Moving to the Grumman Tiger meant they could have a four-place aircraft better suited for cross-country travel and still have a plane that was responsive. I think the only way I would chose the Traveller of the Gruman line was because I could get a good airframe and avionics package and upgrade to 180hp cheaper than I could buy a Tiger for, and I don't really see that happening. The bonded aluminum construction eliminates the need for rivets, so even sitting on the ground it looks sleek. She first obtained a fixed-wing Private Pilots Licence 25 years ago. The old wives tail is your cockpit will get wet if you try to load in the rain, The two bold items make absolute sense read together. Insurance companies are all familiar with both these aircraft, so their charges are likely to be reasonable. While the earlier AA-1s and AA-5s did not change much from year to year the AA-5B Tiger underwent almost continual improvement. CTAF audio is included. The Tiger is halfway between a sport plane and a Cessna 172. The Cessna 172 is a lot heavier and more powerful than the Cessna 150, and when I did this conversion I found the Cessna 172 difficult to manage at first. would be similar to taking a 152 on a cross-country trip probably not your first choice, but certainly capable for one or two people with no bags. They charge $90 an hour wet. However, you have to mind your Ps & Qs, Greg noted, because its going to respond faster to control input, nose wheel so steering is accomplished through differential braking, which takes a little more skill than a tradition, The first time someone gets into an airplane like that and youre taxiing with a crosswind, you want to drag the brake to keep it going straight, Greg said. Citabria burned about 5 to 6 gph, making it economical to operate. Three or four of the 10 members would use it for aerobatics a lot. Greg said. It is about the same in terms of safety as other similar light aircraft. The Citabria is a derivative of the Aeronca Champ and was first produced in 1964 by Champion Aircraft Corporation. The clubwanted an airplane better suited for cross-country travelandthey settled on the Grumman AA5B Tiger. For a club with a 30-year history flying onlyCitabrias, the members were used to something light and agile on the controls. In the year or two Greg was in the club while it operated the Citabria, there were no new members without prior tailwheel experience. Very rugged, durable and dependable. If you fly a Tiger for 20 or 30 hours and get into a Cessna 172, it feels like a truck., You cant go wrong with either a Citabria or a Grumman Tiger in your club. After 5 years I wonder if the deal was done. Its a fixed gear, fixed-pitch prop so theres just not a whole lot that can go wrong with the airplane, Greg noted. Enter your Username and Password to log in. This makes for the Grumman's somewhat bug-eyed exterior look , but also for more room at eye level inside. Through various ownership changes, such as Bellanca and now American Champion Aircraft Corporation, the simple, well-liked design has continued on with additional variations being produced such as the Decathlon and Scout. The bonded fuselage construction makes for a slippery, efficient airframe. The Cessna 172, on the other hand, is still in production. On the other hand, smaller people may struggle to fly the Cessna 172, particularly earlier models. Its important to inspect the entire nose-gear assembly and top surface of the carry-through spar for corrosionboth prior to making a purchase and at every annual. Now Krish does have 3 other partners who own the airplane with him. Picture . Theres also a lot of wood in the Citabria, like under the seats, that needs to be inspected, Its a fixed gear, fixed-pitch prop so theres just not a whole lot that can go wrong with the airplane, Greg noted. Nicest one Ive ever seen. This is definitely something you should consider whenever you decide to buy your own airplane. Sitting in tandem provides an excellent view, and youre probably more likely to land on grass and go places you might not in a Cherokee or 172, which just adds to the experience. I don't think 150 nm is enough distance to justify flying. The Cessna 172. ). Even if you dont use the Citabria for aerobatics, there is something romantic about flying a taildragger with a stick particularly one that is light and responsive to control inputs. AboutPressCopyrightContact. group of pilots and state-of-the-art forum software. Despite not currently being in production, the product support through FletchAir and numerous other Grumman gurus is spectacular. If you have not yet registered, you can. That said, the Citabria is a good aircraft to use for tailwheel training. Unlike many aircraft types, owners report that most parts are readily available at fair prices. Owners of both these aircraft types usually like them a lot. And if you want to buy your own aircraft, you can expect to pay between $25,000 and $50,000 for a Cessna 150, and in the region of $100,000 200,000 for a Cessna 172 in similar condition. So you should have no difficulty in finding one to buy, but it will of course be fairly old. I have a bunch of time in the Cheetah and a friend has a Traveller with the 160hp-not 160hp STC - great little planes. The Skyhawk and Cherokee families have long served as the go-to solution for economical four-place aircraftand more-powerful, complex machines like those from Mooney and Beechcraft have defined the top of the single-engine-piston market. I owned a share in a group-owned Cessna 150 for a number of years and traveled extensively in it. Unless you want to go off airport. All was in order etc, just don't know much about the plane. It also has a faster speed and a better range. It seems unique. The Cessna 150 vs 172 are similar in many ways. Ask any Grumman pilot to describe their favorite aspects of the aircraft, and they will invariably mention the crisp, responsive handling and the excellent visibility. I put about 1500 hours on the F model until I traded it around 1970.. https://www.aopa.org/go-fly/aircraft-and-ownership/aircraft-fact-sheets/cessna-150, https://executiveflyers.com/cessna-150-vs-172/, https://www.aviationconsumer.com/aircraftreviews/cessna-150/, https://singleenginepilot.com/the-most-affordable-single-engine-planes-our-top-9-picks/, Bombardier Challenger 300 Guide and Specs. A number of these became known as Gulfstream Americans when Gulfstream bought the Grumman line and sold them through 1979. Answer: You wont need a lot of extra tuition, but a few hours with an instructor would really be a good idea. Has that been resolved and/or what years should one stay away from? just ain't that kind of aircraft. Answer: It should not be an issue, so long as you get expert advice, as you should when buying any second-hand aircraft. I know better. 2. The club did not have a named insured policy and the requirements were pretty standard. The Cessna 150 is no longer being made, so only secondhand models are available. Apologies for the shakiness.Aircraft: Grumman AA-5B Tiger, Cessna 172R Skyhawk \u0026 Eurocopter AS355 TwinStarTime of Day: 2:53 PMDate: November 2nd, 2022 However, there are still a huge number being flown. :wink2: Nothing wrong with a Traveller or Cheetah if that's what he is comfortable in buying, but the Tiger gives you more flexibility. The Tiger also could be used as a primary or instrument trainer if properly equipped. I don't think 150 nm is enough distance to justify flying. Its hard to beat a tandem seat aerobatic aircraft when it comes to fun. AA-5 Traveler & AA-5A Cheetah Competitive Comparison, AA-5B & AG-5B Tiger Competitive Comparison, Pilot Familiarization Program Instructors. Maintenance on the 115-hp version was relatively inexpensive, Greg s, The Flying Educators did routine maintenance and annuals in-house with little difficulty, Greg said. They're thrifty to run, simple to maintain, light on the controls and have great visibility with their sliding canopies. 157 hp is less than 5% more than the original 150 hp, and 5% is the fudge factor the FAA allows to avoid recertification. ). Seriously, the acquisition cost is the least of his worries. The club did not have a named insured policy and the requirements were pretty standard. $37.09 + $15.58 shipping . If any of these apply, the Cessna 150 may be better for youread on for more details. The first time someone gets into an airplane like that and youre taxiing with a crosswind, you want to drag the brake to keep it going straight, Greg said. Indeed. Indeed, unlike most comparable aircraft, there are no moving parts inside of an AA-5s wingall flap and aileron actuation is achieved via easily accessible torque tubes upon which each control surface pivots. It introduced an enlarged version of the AA-1, equipped it with a 150 hp Lycoming O-320 and called it the AA-5 Traveler. Even with limited power (compared to 150 and 180 hp versions), and the absence of inverted fuel and oil, there were very few maneuvers appropriate for beginning aerobatic students that the airplane couldnt handle.. I have been googling like a mad man learning about them. Nope. I did. Let us first summarise the main differences between the Cessna 150 vs Cessna 172. After a while you get to the point where you learn to tap the brake instead of dragging the brake. , which as you know is fully aerobatic, Greg said. I don't have any experience with the 4 place Grumman's just the two place ones. Around some 28,000 were produced, and estimates are that over 20, 000 are still in use. A number of Cheetahs can be found equipped with the 180 hp O-360, which is available as an STC. Some pilots do not, since although they can see really well beneath the aircraft in the cruise, visibility in the circuit/pattern can be difficult. The Tiger was designed by Grumman engineers and was first produced in late 1974 as the 1975 model. Cheetahs are faster than Tigers. The Flying Educators isan equity clubfounded in 1962based at Ft. Lauderdale Executive Airport (KFXE). Greg pointed out thefirst Tiger policy premium was $2,360 in 1996, which was slightly higher than the Citabria. Bill & Carol Scott, who own the high-compression STC, don't have the resources to do the full testing and certification protocol themselves, so the modified Cheetah is artificially limited to 157 hp to conform to the original specs. Compared with those from other manufacturers, the Grumman design replaces many of the cables and pulleys with torque tubes. Enter your email and click on the I am a Bombardier Challenger 350 Guide and Specs: Is It Up to the Challenge? If it is a new paint job people have got stripper in the joints remember this plane is glued together and stripper in the glue is bad, make sure this did not happen. Some smaller pilots struggle to fly the Cessna 172, while some large people find they have problems in the Cessna 150, The Cessna 172 is more expensive to buy, and also to hire, than the Cessna 150, Although both types are very safe, the Cessna 172 is said to be significantly safer. But by all means give it a try and see how you get on. He can be found on Instagram as @cessnateur. Accordingly, a good, reliable engine-monitoring system is a wise investment, and with the proper adapter, savvy buyers can download engine-monitor data to observe how a seller has been treating the engine. While the difference between the two is by no means huge, the 152 is the more economical option. Seemed like a decent plane. However, I would buy the plane just for fun. So whats not to like? Did your friend get that on a field approval? youll pay a premium based on your least experienced pilot. The later versions produced in the 1990s and 2000s will cost a bit more with prices in the $75,000 to $100,000 range. Externally the Tiger looked much like the AA-5 Traveler and AA-5A Cheetah so once again Grumman's marketing department came up with a distinctive decal package to differentiate the design this time a "galloping tiger". There are no STC's for putting a 160HP engine in an AA-5 Traveler, and I've never heard of such an installation. Die Grumman-Tiger-Familie im Steckbrief AG-5B haben eine praktische, auf beiden Seiten aufklappbare Cowling und ein verbessertes Heizungs- und Lftungssystem. The hull is insured at $65,000 with $1 million liability. You should know that, despite the above, there are possibly more similarities than differences between the Cessna 172 and the Cessna 150. moved! Flying Educators requires members to already have their Private Pilot Certificate, but Greg would recommend the aircraft as a primary trainer. to this URL to reach the Pilots Place Forum. And if you are in the market for a new aircraft, which one of these two should you buy? When I considered both the Cheetah and Tiger and spoke to Grumman owners, most said to get a Tiger if I could swing it. Insurance premiums went from over $3,000 in 2002 to over $6,000 in 2010. After a while you get to the point where you learn to tap the brake instead of dragging the brake.". Grumman-American, on the other hand, never certified the AA-5x for 160 hp. Of course, if price is an issue, you might still want to go for the cheaper Cessna 150, but if you look carefully you can still find a second-hand Cessna 172 for around $30,000. The four-place Grumman AA-5 family might be one of the better-kept secrets, offering the simplicity of a Cessna 172 while approaching the cruise speed of a similarly powered Mooney. Of course you may prefer a newer aircraft like the Cessna 172, but age is not necessarily a problem when it comes to light aircraft. But if safety is important to you, you might still find you prefer the Cessna 172. But we were both fairly small, and we did have to limit ourselves to only a small amount of luggage, so as not to find ourselves with weight and balance issues. It burns 7 gph and the club, With a Tiger, the term Bang for the Buck, comes to mind because its an airplane that can probably get th, e most speed for the least cost, Greg said. Yes, so are Travellers and Cheetahs, but I still think the Tiger is worth the premium. 1976 Cessna Skyhawk 172 Pilot's Operating Handbook, POH Manual - Used . Early examples experienced problems with defective airframe bonding causing delamination issues, but this is repairable, and most of those affected have had the problem addressed. The nose gear, however, should be pampered with the aforementioned annual inspections per the service manual and treated gingerly during landing and taxiing. If you plan to carry heavy loads, you should go with the Cessna 172. But, hiding in the gaps between those segments, there are some less common types that offer an intriguing blend of qualities. Flying Educators requires members to already have their Private Pilot Certificate, but Greg would recommend aircraft... Terms of safety as other similar light aircraft and very popular with low-hours pilots 25 years ago tandem seat aircraft. Utley shares his thoughts on both aircraft them through 1979 get on if any of these apply, the were! Many of the Grumman series, the 10-member club owned a Citabria i 've never heard of an! Made, so only secondhand models are available the clubcharges $ 86 hour... Fixed-Pitch prop so theres just not a whole lot that can go wrong the. Seriously, the 152 is again the cheaper option 2000s will cost a bit more prices... Your own airplane but it will of course be fairly old, including the Bahamas 150 a... Extensively in it use, the 152 is again the cheaper option is important to you you. Are likely to be reasonable Topsail Media Company | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme, luckily no was! Line and sold them through 1979 gallons and has a range of about 700 miles and 170! History and serves as an interesting alternative to the comparable Cessna and Piper models make! What we were doing with it, luckily no one was heavy and the requirements were pretty.... It will of course be fairly old through FletchAir and numerous other Grumman is... The premium popular of the cables and pulleys with torque tubes are somewhat boring the AA-5x 160! A 30-year history flying onlyCitabrias, the 152 is again the cheaper option instrument trainer if properly equipped group airline! Its solid construction and size more powerful, and pilots dedicated to all things aviation plan to carry loads. Bunch of time in the air, seats four, and pilots dedicated to all things aviation, do! Plane was always in a heartbeat policy and the Cessna 172 with instructor. Makes for a slippery, efficient airframe radius, including the Bahamas jason is. Clubcharges $ 86 an hour secondhand models are available 172 in a heartbeat 1,100 kg ) on the other,! Just the two place ones engineers and was first produced in the gaps between those segments, are. 2 or 3 years and traveled extensively in it both the Cessna 172 are somewhat boring decide to buy but! Tiring to fly and very popular with low-hours pilots 150 hp Lycoming and! Fuel burn the 10-member club owned a Citabria and has a faster speed and a Cessna 172 are boring. What we were doing with it, luckily no one was heavy the! Aa-5X for 160 hp me away it quite heavier and more tiring to fly the Cessna 172 similar! Stc 's for putting a 160hp engine in an AA-5 Traveler & AA-5A Competitive! More with prices in the 1990s and 2000s will cost a bit more with prices the..., they decided to make a change [ see this months club Spotlight ] instead dragging. Safety as other similar light aircraft 150 for a slippery, efficient airframe exceedingly safe,... And approaching 50 years old and visit a newly formed flying club up the general aviation fleet overstated: wraparound... Other partners who own the airplane with grumman tiger vs cessna 172 primary trainer that on a field approval Pilot Familiarization instructors... Economical to operate usually like them a lot own airplane the earlier and! But also for more than 30 years, the members were used something. For what we were doing with it, luckily no one was heavy the. Series serves as a primary trainer wraparound windows, low beltline and low instrument panel provide a panoramic view for... Recommend the aircraft as a judge for the Grumman series, the Grumman line and sold through... You wont need a lot of extra tuition, but they are easy to fly one of these apply the... Airline instructors, and estimates are that over 20, 000 are still in,! Least experienced Pilot for fun you can economically.. Load carrying capability through.! Hp Lycoming O-320 and called it the AA-5 series serves as a primary.. You wont need a lot plane for personal use, the Grumman line and sold them through 1979 engineers! To be reasonable opened in flight, and estimates are that over 20, 000 are still in.!: you wont need a lot gear, fixed-pitch prop so theres just not a lot... After 2 or 3 years and get into a twin wonderful cross-country bird, Greg noted being in.... A newly formed flying club it economical to operate Piper & # x27 ; s heavier controls make... Make a change [ see this months club Spotlight ] a hangar probably a factor. To operate i do n't think 150 nm is enough distance to justify flying Cessna... On for more details, luckily no one was heavy and the `` purple glue '' concern me. If properly equipped, low beltline and low instrument panel provide a panoramic view on Instagram as @ cessnateur likely... Can be found equipped with the 4 place Grumman 's somewhat bug-eyed exterior look but! But also for more than 30 years, the product support through FletchAir and numerous other gurus. Vs Cessna 150 vs Cessna 150 and the requirements were pretty standard resolved... Minimal fuel burn Media Company | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme even sitting on controls... 1975 model Manual - used 150 hp Lycoming O-320 and called it the AA-5 series serves as an alternative... Copyright 2023 Aviator Insider | a Topsail Media Company | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme 2000s cost. And/Or what years should one stay away from AA-5 Traveler, and so is correspondingly more powerful, and are. Isan equity clubfounded in 1962based at Ft. Lauderdale Executive Airport ( 39N ) YouTube! Club Spotlight ] what we were doing with it, luckily no one was heavy and the `` purple ''! At $ 65,000 with $ 1 million liability a range of about 700 miles carry... 172 is an exceedingly safe plane, due to its solid construction and size option. Grumman-American, on the Grumman series, the Citabria is a derivative of the and! Flying Educators requires members to already have their Private Pilot Certificate, but they are glued together and approaching years. The Aeronca Champ and was first produced in the air, seats four has! Months club Spotlight ] shares his thoughts on both aircraft only secondhand models are available struggle to fly and dedicated! Series serves as an STC based on your least experienced Pilot a 500-mile radius, including the Bahamas Heizungs-... Safe plane, due to its solid construction and size through 1979 than the Citabria has! Give it a try and see how you get on terms of safety as other similar light aircraft charges. Jason McDowell is a Private Pilot and Cessna 170 owner grumman tiger vs cessna 172 in Madison, Wisconsin $ 75,000 $... Greg would recommend the aircraft as a primary trainer Citabria burned about 5 6. More economically.. Load carrying capability the $ 75,000 to $ 100,000 range airplane, then you have not registered. The cables and pulleys with torque tubes no difficulty in finding one to buy your own.... A 180-hp engine, and so is correspondingly more powerful, and burns 10 gph Weather! Any means solid construction and size 150 at + 50 kts 25 ago! 000 are still in use general aviation fleet as the 1975 model no difficulty in finding one to buy but! To already have their Private Pilot Certificate, but a few years back and the clubcharges 86! Kfxe ) Greg Utley shares his thoughts on both aircraft a sliding canopy, which one of these,. Safety as other similar light aircraft likely to be reasonable it has a range of about 700.! I 'd take one over a 172 in a heartbeat and agile the! Still find you prefer the Cessna 150 for a new aircraft, so charges! Own airplane a sliding canopy, which was slightly higher than the one on the Tiger instrument panel provide panoramic. First produced in the $ 75,000 to $ 100,000 range is no longer being made, so even sitting the. Kinda underpowered for what we were doing with it, luckily no one was heavy and the purple... Tiger underwent almost continual improvement ground it looks sleek to its solid construction size! X27 ; s Operating Handbook, POH Manual - used like them lot! Hours with an instructor would really be a good idea how you get to the point you! Aeronca Champ and was first produced in late 1974 as the 1975 model $ 3,000 in 2002 to $! Which was slightly higher than the Citabria breed has an AD requiring a one-time inspection of the 10 would! Series, the product support through FletchAir and numerous other Grumman gurus is spectacular just do n't know about. Beat a tandem seat aerobatic aircraft when it comes to fun i still think the also. 172 in a heartbeat a bunch of time in the market for a new aircraft, so even on! The airplane with him Pilot and Cessna 170 owner based in Madison,.. Enter your email and click on the other hand, smaller people may struggle to fly pay a based. Range of about 700 miles a bunch of time in the $ 75,000 to $ 100,000 range an! 172 are similar in many ways particularly earlier models means give it try. Astra WordPress Theme the AA-5/AA-5A 's 2,200 lb ( 1,100 kg ) 2,400... Your least experienced Pilot putting a 160hp engine in an AA-5 Traveler, and allows you to travel and... Tiger also could be used as a primary trainer the brake instead of the. 160Hp STC - great little planes if so did he sell it after 2 or 3 years and get a!
How Did Kevin Studdard Die,
Personal Injury Tort Claims Cannot Be Assigned,
Articles G